Froment’s Sign & Jeanne’s Sign in Ulnar Palsy,
Clinical Pearl No. 25 – June 2013

HandLab Clinical Pearls

June 2013                             No. 25

 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FROMENT’S SIGN AND JEANNE’S SIGN IN ULNAR PALSY

 

Thumb stability is possible because of coordinated contraction of the thumb muscles. Imagine three people pulling equally on three guy wires attached to the top of a pole that is resting on the ground. If any one individual alters tension on a guy wire, the pole moves. The thumb is similar to the pole, but more complex since the muscles (guy wires) have to maintain balance at three joints simultaneously.

When the ulnar nerve is not functioning, the thumb loses the pull of the adductor pollicis (AP), as well as one belly of the flexor pollicis brevis (FPB). These losses remove one of the essential “guy wires” and the balance is thrown off.

Many think the adductor pollicis only brings the first metacarpal toward the second metacarpal (adduction). The AP insertion into the ulnar sesamoid/ volar plate is indeed primarily responsible for adduction, but the insertion into the base of the proximal phalanx/dorsal apparatus also directs power to both metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint flexion and IP joint extension.

Froment’s sign (1)

When the patient grasps a piece of paper between the thumb & index fingertips of both hands and the examiner pulls on the paper, the thumb with ulnar palsy flexes at the interphalangeal (IP) joint, while the uninjured thumb will not flex [or only minimally]. The absence of the AP power removes one of the MP joint flexion/IP joint extension forces, so the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) power becomes more dominate.

 

Froment's Sign

Froment’s sign: As paper is pulled away by the examiner, thumb on left shows IP joint flexion as compared to thumb on right.

Jeanne’s Sign (2)

Similar to Froment’s sign, Jeanne’s sign is also seen in response to pinch forces. Instead of isolated thumb IP flexion, the IP flexion is accompanied by MP joint hyperextension.

Some individuals have normal MP joint volar plate laxity, allowing hyperextension of the joint. Therefore if Jeanne’s sign is seen, one must determine whether it is related to a normally lax volar plate or to the absence of part or all (innervation is variable) of the FPB-or both.

The most vital observation is the comparison to the contralateral uninjured thumb. If both thumbs are fully innervated it is likely (but not absolute) that the pinch pattern will be similar.

Jeannes Sign

Jeanne’s Sign: MP joint hyperextension with IP joint flexion.

 

REFERENCES
1. Froment, J. “La prehension dans les paralysies, du nerf cubital et la signe du ponce.” Presse med.23 (1915): 409.
2. Jeanne M. “La deformation du ponce la paralysie cubitale.” Bul Mem Soc Chir Paris 41 (1915): 703-19.


Download Clinical Pearl No. 25, Difference between Froment’s Sign and Jeanne’s Sign in Ulnar Palsy, June 2013

 

ADDITIONAL SUGGESTED READING

Clinical Pearl #29 – The Hoffman-Tinel Sign

Clinical Pearl #10 – The Linburg-Comstock Anomaly

Clinical Pearl #8 – Finkelstein’s Test: Do We Do It the Same and Who Is Doing it Correctly?

Clinical Pearl #6 – Technique for Recording Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Response

Splinting the Hand with a Peripheral Nerve Injury, Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity – 2002

Anatomic Considerations for Splinting the Thumb, Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity – 2002

Obstetrical Brachial Palsy: The Hand Therapist’s Role, Tendon and Nerve Surgery in the Hand: A Third Decade – 1997

Soft Splinting Technique for Maintaining Thumb Abduction, Journal of Hand Therapy – 1991

Video Clip – Drawing the Thumb Muscles

 

© HandLab; 2014 all rights reserved


Disclaimer: HandLab Clinical Pearls are intended to be an informal sharing of practical clinical ideas; not formal evidence-based conclusions of fact.